| 
 | 
| 'Celebrity Big Brother 2007' Controversy
 | 
 
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection 
 For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 200; For delivery through Shipping & Handling Charges extra: Rs. 200 +Shipping & Handling Charges extra »Business Ethics Case Studies » Business Ethics Short Case Studies » Short Case Studies » View Detailed Pricing Info » How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies » Case Studies by Area » Case Studies by Industry » Case Studies by Company   
    Custom Search
   
Please note: | ||||||||||
| "Much of what is shown on Big Brother is grotesque. I think the current controversy only serves to underline this point. I am saddened by the way in which the programme now seems to be operating. It is encouraging unhappy, unfortunate and dysfunctional people to misbehave. I am surprised that Channel 4's chief executive should allow this travesty to continue."1 - Vanni Treves, Former Chairman, Channel 4 2, in January 2007. "There is a very thin line between what is entertainment and a vile spectacle and I think we are in that area now. What this treatment (alleged bullying and racist abuse) of Shilpa has done is remind a lot of Asian people in Britain of the type of uncomfortable treatment they've received themselves over the years."3 - Meera Syal, Actress and Women Rights Activist, in January 2007. The Winner
 Shetty, the first Indian to have participated in the British television show, bagged an estimated £100,0008 in prize money by defeating the last remaining contestant, Jermaine Jackson, the brother of well-known pop singer Michael Jackson. 
 'Celebrity Big Brother 2007' Controversy - Next Page>> 
   
    Custom Search
   
 
 1] "Channel 4 May Axe Big Brother,"The Times of 
	India, January 22, 2007.  | 
Case Studies Links:- 
Case Studies, 
Short Case Studies, 
Simplified Case Studies.
Other Case Studies:- 
Multimedia Case Studies, 
Cases in Other Languages.
Business Reports Link:-  
Business Reports.
Books:- 
Textbooks, 
Work Books,
Case Study Volumes.